You will be able to compose the psychological profile of Eve? Who was she? Why do people, when they think of weakness and betrayal, think of Eva, less to Adam? How could it be totally different from her consort, since he got out of his side? We can speak the same fate?

As proof that they were created from a single dough is their reaction to temptation. They presented basically the same: Eva bent ear as the cunning of the serpent, Adam, a character in the mirror, did the same on a proposal Eve. As Eva has not assumed responsibility for the offense, blaming the serpent, Adam has not assumed any responsibility and blamed him Eve. There’s a very mature attitude on his part, is not it? And that given that he was in fact the “mother”. We could expect from him the maternal instincts, grace, power to provide protection … Instead, receiving Eve, the first woman of the world, woman and child? Receiving from Adam? Accuse and slander. To think that the proposal cunning serpent destabilized it and public opprobrium of the entire humanity almost destroyed it. It is subject to a media lynching forever.

But scroll facts. birds of the air and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them: and anyway will be called Adam all living beings, so it will be called. And Adam called the name of all the beasts and all the birds and all the wild animals; but for Adam there was found help on his suit. Then the Lord God brought a deep sleep upon Adam, and he slept; and he took one of his ribs, and it has filled its place with flesh. And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from Adam turned it into a woman and brought her to Adam. And Adam said: <This time, here is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh !; This text, an exemplary beauty, draws our attention to a very important fact in the history of human emotion. It is the first romance of humanity, whose pattern will repeat again: the same search, first undefined, confusing the same feeling of absence, the same need identification to someone in the contrary … Adam longed Eva even before it can be . He felt unfulfilled, disharmonious. Although it had available wild animals and birds, and even more than that, received the distinction of naming them, he was lonely. It had to be someone on the contrary. Such could be just Eva, one born of his rib. Calling it thus Eve, meaning life, and transferred Adam and motherhood. If they were right, it was possible that void caused, the dramatic split between them? Only Adam was full of gifts and was unique in every sense of the word.

It spoke of indulgence, greed, pride and, of course, disobedience. But why not admit and doubt? The prohibition of eating the forbidden fruit and God was addressed only to Adam, who received intermediate between Heavenly Father and his wife. Here priesthood already in sight of the man. The first human concerns were: the appointment beings, longing for each other, motherhood and priesthood. So Eva command knew from her husband. Who is more guilty if Eva was deflected by Adam while Adam was deflected by God Himself? Nor have thought too much. When the serpent said, “Ye shall be as gods …” promise seem appealing, but in reality, it was meaningless, because they were already like God. They were made in the image and likeness of Heavenly Father. The two were lost through ignorance and self neiubirii. Then over this ignorance were added curse and leather clothes that are “a darkening of the image of God in man, a fall from the state line nature … but also a new opportunity to survive death” (Panayotis Nellas ” The man – animal deified “). Christian anthropology, Lossky shows, is a fight for re-deification of man, regaining the lost gift. Eva has a role here, certainly.

Camelia Leonte